Cases 1 - 10 of 15
US v. Teofilo Cervin
as 23-7191
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TEOFILO SALINAS CERVIN, a/k/a Enrique Sandoval Arizmendi
Cervin v. USA
as 5:2017cv00131
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Teofilo Salinas Cervin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cervin v. Bonavita et al
as 2:2017cv00252
Defendant:
Bonnie Bonavita, Conlon Senior Center and Ventura Investment Company
Plaintiff:
Malka Cervin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Teofilo Cervin
as 16-4513
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TEOFILO SALINAS CERVIN, a/k/a Enrique Sandoval Arizmendi
Cervin v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02951
Plaintiff:
Corey Lee Cervin
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cervin v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as MN/0:15-cv-00647
Plaintiff:
Corey Lee Cervin
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cervin v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv00647
Plaintiff:
Corey Lee Cervin
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cervin v. Grounds
as 2:2013cv01422
Petitioner:
Manuel Jose Cervin
Respondent:
Grounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re ex parte Application of Natica Shipping Ltd.
as 1:2012mc00240
Petitioner:
Natica Shipping Ltd.
Interested Party:
RTI Limited
Intervenor:
Calibre Properties Worldwide Ltd., United Company Rusal PLC, Rual Trade Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
In re ex parte Application of Natica Shipping Ltd.
Cause Of Action: M 19-96 Letters Rogatory - Great Britain
Ramon McGraw v. Berry Sims, et al
as 11-2859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant - Appellee:
Berry Sims, Pulaski County Circuit Judge, Kent Krouse, Public Defender, Gary Arnold, Saline County Circuit Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
