Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Sheeran v. Anderson et al
as 4:2019cv00945
Plaintiff:
Andrea Lynn Sheeran
Defendant:
Huff, Chad Anderson, Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. 13 Red Media Limited et al
as 2:2019cv04770
Defendant:
Keith Miller, 13 Red Media Limited, Chad Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woodall v. Wheatley et al
as 4:2018cv00713
Defendant:
Larry Hacker, Alvin Griffin, Charles Delaney and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Woodall and Frank J Woodall, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDRUS et al v. USA
as 1:2017cv01657
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM ANDRUS , JACKIE ANDRUS , ELIZABETH ANN ABBOTT and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Anderson v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv01094
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America Inc, Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, Home Depot Inc The and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MDL 2792 SAMSUNG TOP-LOAD WASHING MACHINE MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
as 5:2017ml02792
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America Inc, Samsung Electronics Company LTD, Best Buy Co Inc and others
In Re:
Samsung Top-Load Washing Machine Marketing, Sales Practices And Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wells, Carolyn Mccabe, Joseph Troyan and others
Interested Party:
Nagel Rice, LLP
Not Classified By Court:
John Douglas Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnett v. Anderson
as 4:2017cv00110
Petitioner:
William R Barnett
Respondent:
Chad Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plumb v. Anderson
as 4:2016cv00873
Plaintiff:
Mark Dwayne Plumb
Defendant:
Chad Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plumb v. Anderson
as 4:2016cv00878
Plaintiff:
Mark Dwayne Plumb
Defendant:
Chad Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plumb v. Anderson et al
as 4:2016cv00835
Plaintiff:
Mark Dwayne Plumb
Defendant:
Chad Anderson and Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
