Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Stewart v. Christiansen et al
as 2:2026cv12048
Plaintiff:
Dequarius Stewart
Defendant:
John Christiansen, John Doe, Karson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-3723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00333
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kevin D. Chaffin v. West Publishing Corporation et al
as 0:2026cv02376
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Chaffin
Defendant:
West Publishing Corporation and THOMSON REUTERS ENTERPRISE CENTRE GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
CHAFFIN v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv03589
Plaintiff:
REBECCA CHAFFIN
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tucker v. Nalley et al
as 2:2026cv11187
Plaintiff:
L.T. Tucker, Jr. and Kitwana Omari Mbwana
Defendant:
Nalley, Tighe, Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00261
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CHAFFIN v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv03063
Plaintiff:
ANGELA CHAFFIN
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Estate of Michael Rogel v. City of Bozeman, et al.
as 26-1528
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF MICHAEL ROGEL
Defendant:
CITY OF BOZEMAN, JUSTIN CHAFFINS, ZACHARY GARFIELD and others
Estate of Michael Rogel v. Chaffins, et al.
as 26-1525
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF MICHAEL ROGEL, by and through its personal representative, Mary Rogel
Defendant:
JUSTIN CHAFFINS, CITY OF BOZEMAN, ZACHARY GARFIELD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
