Cases 1 - 10 of 10
McGlone v. D.R.C. Warren Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lawrence McGlone, II
Defendant:
D.R.C. Warren Correctional Institution, C.O. Shaski, C.O. Pennzki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seiler v. Semple
as 17-2375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jonathan S. Seiler
Defendant - Appellee:
Scott Semple, Correctional Officer Watson, Captain, Correctional Officer Cossette and others
Seiler v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv01171
Plaintiff:
Jonathan S. Seiler
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Scott Erfe, Cossette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seiler v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv01005
Plaintiff:
Jonathan S. Seiler
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Watson, Cossette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barry v. Cumberland County Jail, et al
as 16-2466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL MICHAEL BARRY
Defendant - Appellee:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL, EDITH WOODWARD, RALPH DUBOIS and others
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES
Rogers, Jr. v. Enloe et al
as 3:2016cv50149
Plaintiff:
Theodore Rogers, Jr.
Defendant:
Donald Enloe, Chamberland, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demitrius McGee v. Chamberlin, et al
as 14-56173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMITRIUS MCGEE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHAMBERLIN, M.D., TRAVIS H. CALVIN, M.D., Neurosurgeon, KU, M.D. and others
Dorsey v. Beebe et al
as 9:2010cv01067
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dorsey
Defendant:
Beebe, S. Broom, Business Office Room and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. Beebee et al
as 9:2010cv01030
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dorsey
Defendant:
Beebee, Norman Bezio, Carpentar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stroman v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2009cv11542
Plaintiff:
Evans E. Stroman
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Massachusetts Department of Corrections, Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
