Cases 1 - 10 of 164
(PC) Murphy v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Charles B. Smith, Nathan Nutting, Charles Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Charles B. Smith, Nathan Nutting, Charles Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Jr. II v. Osborn CI
as 3:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Smith, Jr. II
Defendant:
Osborn CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Wake et al
as 3:2023cv00590
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Smith
Defendant:
N. Wake, Tim Garret and K. Shea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lard et al
as 7:2023cv00756
Plaintiff:
Charles Jerall Smith
Defendant:
Chad T. Lard and Anne Hedges Horst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Smith, Jr. v. Daniel Shue, et al
as 23-3435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Abraham Smith, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Daniel Shue, Prosecuting Attorney, Sebastian County, Barret Milam, Prosecuting Attorney, Sebastian County, City of Fort Smith, Arkansas/Greenwood District and others
Smith v. Kiser et al
as 7:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Charles Jerall Smith
Defendant:
Justin Kiser and Sarah Derham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv01296
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ABRAHAM SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, MIKE PENSE and SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Shue et al
as 2:2023cv02061
Plaintiff:
Charles Abraham Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel Shue, Barret Milam, City of Fort Smith, Arkansas/Greenwood District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Biden et al
as 5:2023cv05072
Plaintiff:
Charles Abraham Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
President Joe Biden, Mike Pense and Secretary of Defense
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
