Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Smith, Jr. II v. Osborn CI
as 3:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Smith, Jr. II
Defendant:
Osborn CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Smith, Jr. v. Daniel Shue, et al
as 23-3435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Abraham Smith, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Daniel Shue, Prosecuting Attorney, Sebastian County, Barret Milam, Prosecuting Attorney, Sebastian County, City of Fort Smith, Arkansas/Greenwood District and others
Smith v. Shue et al
as 2:2023cv02061
Plaintiff:
Charles Abraham Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel Shue, Barret Milam, City of Fort Smith, Arkansas/Greenwood District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Watkins
as 2:2022cv02162
Plaintiff:
Charles Abraham Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Rita Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Nurse Michaels et al
as 3:2021cv00746
Plaintiff:
Charles Jr. Smith
Defendant:
Nurse Michaels, Mason and Miller
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. MOSER et al
as 3:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PAUL SMITH
Defendant:
WARDEN V. MOSER, BOP DIRECTOR and BOP NER DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smith #484290 v. Nevins et al
as 1:2021cv00030
Defendant:
Unknown Leavitt, Pam Sanders, Khris Nevins and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Smith #484290
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Daugherty et al
as 6:2020cv00074
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, D.J. Godfrey, Carla Stretzel and others
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Moralis et al
as 4:2018cv00311
Defendant:
Dr. Agyemang, Dr. Awe and Warden Moralis
Plaintiff:
Charles Justin Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUDSON v. REVELS et al
as 1:2018cv00065
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCOTT HUDSON
Defendant:
WHITNEY DANIELLE REVELS, DEAN LOCKLEAR, RONALD COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
