Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Blount v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv21468
Plaintiff:
Charles Blount
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Estate of David Ward, by and through successor in interest, Ernestine Ward et al v. County of Sonoma et al
as 4:2020cv03400
Defendant:
Mark Essick, Charles Blount, County of Sonoma and others
Plaintiff:
Ernestine Ward and Estate of David Ward, by and through successor in interest, Ernestine Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zeen v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2017cv02056
Plaintiff:
Dane Zeen
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Steve Freitas, Michael Yoder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maye et al v. County of Sonoma et al
as 4:2014cv02841
Plaintiff:
Lynda Maye and L. H.
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Madeline Sowers, Darcee Drakulich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beardsley v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2013cv05138
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Beardsley
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Sonoma County Sheriffs Department, Steve Freitas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLOUNT v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv01733
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BLOUNT
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BLOUNT v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2011cv00238
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BLOUNT
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BLOUNT v. BENNETT
as 1:2007cv00249
Petitioner:
CHARLES BLOUNT
Respondent:
BOYD BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
