Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Daniel Dragash v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, et al
as 21-13760
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL D. DRAGASH
Defendant / Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, STEPHEN M. WALKER, CHARLES E. ROBERTS and others
Dragash v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 8:2021cv01642
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dragash
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. Defendant., Stephen M. Walker, Charles E. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Sheldon v. Golden Sheldon et al
as 8:2020cv02526
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Sarasota Sheriff's Department, De Facto Sarasota Leadership and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. State of Florida et al
as 8:2020cv00226
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Sarasota County Police Chief, Nancy Ludwigsen and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Conrad Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reiblich v. Moss et al
as 8:2016cv01553
Plaintiff:
Mitchell W. Reiblich
Defendant:
Dana Moss, Andrew R. Van Sickles, Charles E. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reiblich v. Moss et al
as 8:2016cv01484
Plaintiff:
Mitchell W. Reiblich
Defendant:
Dana Moss, Andrew R. Van Sickles, Charles E. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Ballard et al
as 2:2015cv15458
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Roberts
Defendant:
David Ballard , Jean Kennedy , Kathi Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv01265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mosley v. Department of the Navy et al
as 6:2012cv00493
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Mosley
Defendant:
Department of the Navy, Charles E. Roberts, Ray Mabus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Philip Pohl v. Rick Thaler, et al
as 10-41160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILIP J POHL
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, ELIZABETH E. COKER, TIMOTHY C SIMMONS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
