Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01242
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00115
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HUDSON v. REVELS et al
as 1:2018cv00065
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCOTT HUDSON
Defendant:
WHITNEY DANIELLE REVELS, DEAN LOCKLEAR, RONALD COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2008cv00108
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Smith v. Dinisio et al
as 8:2008cv02990
Petitioner:
Charles E. Smith
Respondent:
Dinisio, State Of Maryland and Talbot County
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv01487
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Law Office of Dobbs & Baker v. Smith et al
as 8:2008cv00813
Plaintiff:
Law Office of Dobbs & Baker
Defendant:
Charles E. Smith, United States of America and Law Office of David M. Wasser
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Barnhill v. Veneman
as 07-1145
:
In re: IN RE: PEANUT CROP INSURANCE LITIGATION, MDL-1634
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARVIN TAYLOR BARNHILL, JOEY WATFORD, TOM CLEMENTS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROSS J. DAVIDSON, Administrator for Risk Management Agency, RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY, ANN VENEMAN, Secretary of Agriculture for the United States of America and others
PARKER et al v. COOPER et al
as 1:2007cv00121
Plaintiff:
MONROE R. PARKER, JR. and TONIA R. PARKER
Defendant:
ROY COOPER, R. EDWARDS, MICHAEL EASLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Commissioner Of Social Security
as 7:2007cv00058
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
