Cases 81 - 90 of 1,334
Candace Bishop, et al v. United States
as 23-2223
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Candace Bishop, Personal Representative for the Estate of Charles Edward Bishop, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Bishop, Jr., Estate Plaintiff
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
LANGLEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02797
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD LANGLEY, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WEST v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02810
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD WEST
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PHH Mortgage Corporation v. Westfall et al
as 5:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Sandra K. Westfall, Rhonda Janiece Long, Ronald Eugene Brown, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Nylander et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv00397
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Bruce Nylander, John Merrill Adams, JR, Russell Eugene Ahlberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
BELL v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01146
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD BELL, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harris v. Langley et al
as 3:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Harris
Defendant:
Terry Langley, Carroll County, Lt Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Jones, Sr. v. Dexter Payne
as 23-1062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Nylander et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Robert Bruce Nylander, John Merrill Adams, JR, Russell Eugene Ahlberg and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
