Cases 21 - 30 of 38
HARPER et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv66650
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HARPER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., AMERICAN BRAKE SHOE CO., CAPE INSULATION CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Barfield v. John Ault, et al
as 10-1847
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Barfield
Defendant - Appellee:
John Ault, Charles Harper, Dave DeGrange and others
Duane Yates v. John Baldwin, et al
as 10-1429
Petitioner - Appellant:
Duane Yates
Respondent - Appellee:
John Baldwin, Cornell Smith, John Ault and others
Harper v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2009cv02521
Plaintiff:
William Charles Harper
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, K. Williams, Currie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank Owens v. Donald Mallinger, et al
as 09-2114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frank R. Owens
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald J. Mallinger, Dr. Sanchez, Nurse Julie Pihl and others
Yates v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2009cv03004
Petitioner:
Duane Yates
Respondent:
John Baldwin, Cornell Smith, John Ault and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lawson-Harper v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP et al
as 6:2009cv00121
Plaintiff:
Alice Lawson-Harper, Alice Lawson-Harper, Charles Harper and others
Defendant:
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Astrazeneca LP, Astrazeneca AB and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jones v. Commonwealth Of Virginia et al
as 7:2008cv00632
Plaintiff:
Douglas Lee Jones
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Virginia, Michael Schaefer, Blue Ridge Regional Jail Authority and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ANDERSON et al v. ACCURIDE ERIE L.P.
as 1:2008cv00145
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANDERSON, JAMES ANDERSON, JAMES BRIGGS and others
Defendant:
ACCURIDE ERIE L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Robert Charles Harper v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
as PAE/2:08-CV-69248
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Harper
Defendant:
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
