Cases 1 - 10 of 44
HAWKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv22536
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HAWKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HAWKINS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01707
Petitioner:
CHARLES HAWKINS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
HAWKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01022
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HAWKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hawkins v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
Charles Hawkins
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gates et al v. City of Biloxi, Mississippi
as 1:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Derrick Gates, Robert Hornsby, Cory Mooney and others
Defendant:
City of Biloxi, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Hawkins
as 22-40766
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Charles Hawkins, Jr.
Hawkins v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00053
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Ray Charles Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAWKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv98921
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HAWKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles HawkinsIn re: Charles Hawkins
as 20-1049
Respondent:
RANDEE REWERTS
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES HAWKINS
Wardell v. Ace Electronics et al
as 0:2019cv00180
Plaintiff:
Wendel R. Wardell, Jr. and W. Robert Wardell
Defendant:
Charles Hawkins, Andrew Mansukhani, Ace Electronics and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
