Prisoner Petitions Cases
Raynes v. Smith et al
as 6:2020cv01052
Plaintiff: Charles Matthew Raynes
Defendant: Chris Whitley and Adam Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Sharp County Detention Center We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00039
Plaintiff: Charles Matthew Johnson
Defendant: Sharp County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Yavapai County Detention Center
as 3:2015cv08069
Plaintiff: Charles Matthew Robertson
Defendant: Yavapai County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Garrett v. F/n/u Stephens, et al
as 13-5648
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES MATTHEW GARRETT
Defendant - Appellee: F/N/U STEPHENS, CCS Administrator; In her official capacity and F/N/U TEEMER, Lt.; In his official capacity
Garrett v. Stephens We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00354
Defendant: f/n/u Stephens and f/n/u Teemer
Plaintiff: Charles Matthew Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Austin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00344
Plaintiff: Charles Matthew Garrett
Defendant: f/n/u Austin, f/n/u Newlove and f/n/u Teemer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. USA
as 1:2010cv00168
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Charles Matthew Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Matthews v. California Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01418
Plaintiff: Scott Charles Matthews
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Deuel Vocational Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2007cv01474
Plaintiff: Scott Charles Matthews
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Deuel Vocational Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?