Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00850
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dietrich v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv04503
Defendant:
Special Officer John Does #1-3, Charles Parker and City of New York
Plaintiff:
Juliet Dietrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ot Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camboni v. Allstate Insurance Company et al
as 2:2013cv01846
Plaintiff:
Anthony Camboni
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company, John Haas, Unknown Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
McMahon v. County Commissioners of Kent County et al
as 1:2013cv00490
Plaintiff:
Darek Michael McMahon
Defendant:
County Commissioners of Kent County , Kent County Sheriff's Office , Kent County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Baker, et al v. Katehi, et al
as 2:2012cv00450
Plaintiff:
Enosh Baker , David Buscho , Sarena Grossjan-Navarro and others
Defendant:
Linda Katehi , Ralph J. Hexter , Fred Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McConnell v. Cole
as 1:2011cv02269
Defendant:
Charles Parker Cole
Plaintiff:
William Charles McConnell, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
