Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Riley v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00934
Plaintiff:
Charles Riley
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anthony Cain v. Thomas Evans, et al
as 24-5194
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CAIN, aka Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
THOMAS EVANS, Sergeant, DANA PENNIGER, Lieutenant, JORDAN KIESTER, Lieutenant and others
Riley Sr. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv16481
Plaintiff:
Charles Riley Sr.
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Newell, et al v. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company, et al
as 2:2022cv01357
Defendant:
Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company and Charles Riley
Plaintiff:
Ms. Elizabeth Newell, Ms. Sarah Strasner, Elizabeth Newell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Riley v. United States Bankruptcy Court et al
as 3:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Charles Riley
Defendant:
United States Bankruptcy Court, Hon. David R. Duncan, Bruce M. Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riley v. Riley
as 3:2021cv01076
Plaintiff:
Patrick Riley
Defendant:
Charles Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Martinez
as 21-50040
Defendant / Appellant:
Charles Riley Martinez, also known as Ereez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Riley v. Kinosky
as 1:2020cv00597
Plaintiff:
Kevin Charles Riley
Defendant:
Barbara Kinosky
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
RILEY v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2020cv02048
Respondent:
MELINDA ADAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
CHARLES RILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
