Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Walton v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare et al
as 2:2023cv10169
Plaintiff:
Charles Walton
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, United States Marshal Service, Jonathan Hemingway and others
United States of America v. Williams (Randolph)
as 21-2768
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marvin Williams, Cliphas Belfon, AKA Cliff, Colin Burnett, AKA Greg and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Lashaumba Randolph
United States of America v. Williams (Belfon)
as 21-1444
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert Pinsky, Antonio Santiago, Marvin Williams and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Cliphas Belfon
United States of America v. Williams (Belfon)
as 21-1432
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert Pinsky, Antonio Santiago, Marvin Williams and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Cliphas Belfon
Charles Wright v. Warden, Riverbend Maximum
as 13-6573
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES WALTON WRIGHT
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, RIVERBEND MAXIMUM SECURITY INSTITUTION
Walton et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv22498
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Walton and Charles Walton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walton et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-22498
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Walton and Charles Walton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
PORRECA et al v. THE ROSE GROUP
as 2:2013cv01674
Plaintiff:
CARLY PORRECA and CHARLES WALTON
Defendant:
THE ROSE GROUP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States of America v. $20,740.00 in U.S. Currency
as 3:2011cv02312
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$20,740.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Charles Walton and Michael Hayhurst
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Walton v. Tilton et al
as 1:2010cv00330
Plaintiff:
Charles Walton
Defendant:
James E. Tilton, James D. Hartley, Lonnie Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
