Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Douglas Symmes, Jr. v. North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections
as 26-6792
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, SOPHIA FEASTER, CHARLIE LOCKLEAR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04557
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abreu et al v. Federal Emergency Management Agency
as 1:2026cv02300
Plaintiff:
Monte Aplanado Acequia, Pamela Sue Abreu, James Adrian Abreu and others
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
DeLeon v. King et al
as 9:2026cv01378
Plaintiff:
Jonathan DeLeon
Defendant:
MJ King, C.O. K. Wilcox, Donna Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Contract Dispute
Leonnel Nono Fokouen v. Todd Blanche
as 26-1909
Petitioner:
LEONNEL CHARLIE NONO FOKOUEN
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Rutz v. Faulkner County, Arkansas et al
as 2:2026cv02108
Plaintiff:
Benjamin James Rutz
Defendant:
Faulkner County, Arkansas, Patrick Toft and Charlie Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
