Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-11192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hoskins et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, et al
as 2:2025cv11580
Plaintiff:
Andre Hoskins, Jackie Hoskinson, Henry D Hough and others
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company,, AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS, INC., AMEREX CORPORATION, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Williams v. Bramo et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2025cv00376
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Williams
Defendant:
C/O Bramo, Zadarian Mills, Charlie Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Charlie Harper
as 25-1582
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charlie Jackson Harper
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00101
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Charlie Jackson v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv02416
Defendant:
3M Company, Ciba, Inc., DuPont De Nemours Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
JACKSON v. DOSEK et al
as 3:2023cv24733
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE JACKSON
Defendant:
DOSEK, MICHOT, GUNNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv01354
Defendant:
3M Company, The, DuPont de Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie Jackson and Mary Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jackson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv03734
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charlie Jackson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
