Cases 21 - 30 of 89
Witherspoon v. Government of China
as 4:2020cv03893
Plaintiff:
Albert Lee Witherspoon
Defendant:
Government of China
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuckey et al v. People Republic of China et al
as 4:2020cv07344
Defendant:
National Health Commission of the People Republic of China, Shi Zhengli, People Liberation Army and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Kenneth Stuckey, Anthony Grisby, M. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lonon v. Philbin et al
as 1:2020cv00138
Defendant:
Edward Philbin, James Solen and Augusta State Medical Prison
Plaintiff:
China Lonon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Acon et al
as 1:2020cv23684
Plaintiff:
Alonso Humberto Perry
Defendant:
Costa Rica, China, Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullins v. Country of China, The
as 1:2020cv02447
Defendant:
Country of China, The
Plaintiff:
Joshua Burley Mullins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES-EL v. THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA et al
as 1:2020cv00517
Plaintiff:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES-EL and MUSTAFA MUTA
Defendant:
XI JINPING and THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2020cv00494
Plaintiff:
Warren Stewart, Cleve Billings, Brian Cash and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Republic of China, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stirling v. China et al
as 3:2020cv00713
Plaintiff:
John Philip Stirling
Defendant:
People Republic and China
Petitioner:
Brian Olson and Oscar Marquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Country of China, The
as 2:2020cv01579
Plaintiff:
Emerson Jimel Edwards
Defendant:
Country of China, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett et al v. People of Illinois State et al
as 6:2020cv00373
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Garrett and China Anne McClain
Defendant:
Illinois, Attorney General, Warden or Sheriff, Centralia or I.D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
