Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv01444
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKINNEY v. VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2019cv00413
Defendant:
SCOTT BROWN and VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
JON CHRIS MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Nelson Jenkins v. Hardeman County, Tennessee, et al
as 15-5112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NELSON JENKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
HARDEMAN COUNTY, TENNESSEE, SHERIFF DEPARTMENT HARDEMAN COUNTY, TENNESSEE, JOHN DOOLEN, in his individual and official capacities as the Captain for Hardeman County, Tennessee and others
Nelson Jenkins v. Hardeman County, Tennessee, et al
as 13-6509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NELSON JENKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
HARDEMAN COUNTY, TENNESSEE, SHERIFF DEPARTMENT HARDEMAN COUNTY, TENNESSEE, JOHN DOOLEN, in his individual and official capacities as the Captain for Hardeman County, Tennessee and others
Jenkins v. Hardeman County et al
as 1:2013cv02054
Plaintiff:
Nelson Jenkins
Defendant:
Hardeman County, Tennessee, Sheriff Department Hardeman County, Tennessee, John Doolen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Hardeman County et al
as 2:2013cv02054
Plaintiff:
Nelson Jenkins
Defendant:
Tennessee Hardeman County, Tennessee Sheriff Department Hardeman County, John Doolen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
