Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Kruse v. City of Elk River, The et al
as 0:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Ann Kruse
Defendant:
City of Elk River, The, Elk River Police Department, David Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00594
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ray v. Jenny et al
as 4:2015cv02692
Plaintiff:
Tuezday N Ray
Defendant:
Timothy Jenny, Elsa Vega, Jennifer Robles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Wooddale v. City of Charleston
as 12-2317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WOODDALE, a South Carolina Partnership, WOODLAND PLANTATION LLC, A. VICTOR RAWL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHARLESTON, COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE and JOHNS ISLAND GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
Defendant:
ANNE FRANCIS BLEEKER, in her official capacity and CHRIS MORGAN, in his official capacity
Wooddale v. City of Charleston
as 11-1790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WOODALE PARTNERSHIP, a South Carolina Partnership, WOODLAND PLANTATION LLC, A. VICTOR RAWL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHARLESTON, COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE and JOHNS ISLAND GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
Defendant:
ANNE FRANCIS BLEEKER and CHRIS MORGAN, in his official capacity
Woodale Partnership v. City of Charleston et al
as 2:2007cv02025
Plaintiff:
Woodale Partnership
Defendant:
City of Charleston, Coastal Conservation League, Anne Francis Bleeker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mays, et al v. AR St Dept Education, et al
as 1:1988cv01076
Plaintiff:
Jasper Mays , Pamela Taylor , Charlie Fay Moore and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Don Arensman , Margaret Arensman , Leo Botsford and others
Defendant:
Hamburg School District, The Board of Education of the and Charles F Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
