Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 42
James v. State of New York
as 24-624
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER E. JAMES
Defendant: STATE OF NEW YORK and DONITA E. MCINTOSH, FORMER CLINTON DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF PROGRAM
James v. D'Amore
as 24-474
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER E. JAMES
Respondent: MICHAEL D'AMORE, Superintendent of Marcy Correctional Facility
USA v. James
as 23-10987
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Christopher Dewayne James
James v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv02087
Petitioner: Christopher Dewayne James
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
James v. Maraj
as 22-1781
Plaintiff / Appellant: Christopher Emanuel James, AKA Briss Stone
Defendant / Appellee: Onicka Maraj, AKA Nicki Minaj
McCray v. Green et al
as 5:2022cv00029
Plaintiff: Dr. Pastor Leon Keith McCray, Sr.
Defendant: Victor A. Green, Christopher A. James and Wesley M. Dellinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. The State of New York
as 9:2022cv00260
Plaintiff: Christopher Emanuel James
Defendant: The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. The State of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01404
Plaintiff: Christopher E. James
Defendant: The State of New York and Ms. McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Macintosh We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01120
Petitioner: Christopher E. James
Respondent: Ms. Macintosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JAMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00169
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER T. JAMES
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?