Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ali v. Sledge et al
as 5:2024ct03080
Plaintiff:
Abdulkadir Sharif Ali
Defendant:
Wendy Sledge, Kenneth Washington, William Riddick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Young
as 5:2021cv00552
Petitioner:
Christopher Antuan Jones
Respondent:
Warden David L. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00396
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER EDMOND JONES
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2016hc02074
Petitioner:
Christopher R. Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harris v. Avcook et al
as 5:2015ct03261
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Harris
Defendant:
Unit Manager Avcook, Christopher E. Jones, Rickey Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. SC Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv03120
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Jones
Defendant:
SC Dept of Corrections , Jon Ozmint , Rose Phipps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. SC Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv03120
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Jones
Defendant:
SC Dept of Corrections and Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Christopher Jones v. SC Dept of Corrections
as 09-7309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
SC DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, JON OZMINT, SC DEPT PROBATION PAROLE AND PARDON SERVICES and others
Jones v. Bennett et al
as 5:2009cv00025
Plaintiff:
Christopher N. Jones
Defendant:
Boyd Bennett, Keith Whitener, FNU Baker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. SC Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv01876
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Jones
Defendant:
SC Dept of Corrections , Jon Ozmint , SC Dept Probation Parole and Pardon Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
