Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
THOMAS v. BISIGNANO
as 2:2025cv04442
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KEITH THOMAS
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lamon et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv08661
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wade Lamon, Jerald Phonso Landingham, Darryl Lane and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lamon et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv01019
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wade Lamon, Jerald Phonso Landingham, Darryl Lane and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Patterson v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Christopher Keith Patterson
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Massac v. Estate Chocolate Hole Land Owners Association, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Mr. Christoph Keith Massac
Defendant:
Estate Chocolate Hole Land Owners Association, Inc.
SORTOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43701
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KEITH SORTOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Handy v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2021cv00045
Defendant:
All 50 States, United States Of America and American Territory
Plaintiff:
Christopher Keith Handy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Handy v. Lumpkin
as 20-20597
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher Keith Handy
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Schmotzer v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2020cv03754
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Christopher Keith Schmotzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
