Cases 1 - 10 of 100
BLACKWELL v. HATCHCOTK et al
as 1:2026cv00669
Plaintiff:
DENNIS O'KEITH BLACKWELL
Defendant:
MRS. HATCHCOTK, KENNETH DIGGS, CHRISTOPHER LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Lacy
as 26-6102
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER LEWIS LACY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311 - Uniformed Service Employment or Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) - Discrimination
Johnson v. Lewis et al
as 3:2026cv01628
Plaintiff:
JoQuen Johnson
Defendant:
T Christopher Lewis, Yael Zbolon, Kyle Chaisson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COX v. USA
as 1:2026cv00323
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER LEWIS COX
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lacy v. United States of America
as 5:2026cv00523
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Christopher Lewis Lacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lewis v. Lewis et al
as 6:2025cv00217
Defendant:
David Clay Lewis, Nina Lewis, Fred Busroe and others
Plaintiff:
David Christopher Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Whitley et al
as 3:2025cv03378
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lewis
Defendant:
. Whitley, . Sleeter, Jane Doe, I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hard Yaka, LLC, et al. v. Leiske, et al.
as 25-7509
Plaintiff:
HARD YAKA, LLC and ROBERT GREGORY KIDD
Intervenor:
KEVIN LEISKE, BRETT BELDNER, MARGARET SLEMMER and others
Defendant:
HARD YAKA HC, LLC
Andrews et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv13331
Defendant:
3M Company, Carrier Fire & Security Americas LLC, Carrier Fire & Security Corporation LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Laura Andrews, Tarsha Ball, Keisha Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 a1 Federal Officer Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
