Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Palma et al v. Montgomery County, Maryland et al
as 8:2021cv01090
Plaintiff:
Lilian Palma, Hernan Palma, D. Palma and others
Defendant:
Chief Marcus Jones, Officer Sean Petty, Deputy John-Luke Espinas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Global Diagnostic Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01658
Plaintiff:
Christopher Murray
Defendant:
Wellpath, Global Diagnostic Services, Inc., Roxanne Playso, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
RANSOM v. CLAY
as 4:2019cv00129
Plaintiff:
KELVIN CHARLES RANSOM
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER MURRAY CLAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2019cv00196
Defendant:
Yoh Services, Allison M. Lue, Mike Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Franklyn K. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stewart et al v. Woods Cove, II, LLC. et al
as 1:2016cv00615
Plaintiff:
Eddie L. Stewart , Leslie Brazil and Charles L. Patton, Jr.
Defendant:
Woods Cove, II, LLC. , Woods Cove, III, LLC. and W. Christopher Murray, II,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Filing Error
as 1:2016cv00612
Plaintiff:
Eddie L. Stewart and Charles L. Patton, Jr.
Defendant:
Woods Cove, II, LLC., Woods Cove, III, LLC. and W. Christopher Murray II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Phillips v. Murray et al
as 4:2014cv01916
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III
Defendant:
Christopher Murray, Sam Dodson and City of St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Murray et al
as 4:2014cv00315
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III
Defendant:
Christopher Murray and City of St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. City of Pleasant Grove Alabama et al
as 2:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
Christopher Murray
Defendant:
City of Pleasant Grove Alabama and John Clenendin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2013cv02664
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Graig Buck, Michael Metrinko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
