Cases 11 - 20 of 49
TAYLOR v. WARDEN
as 1:2021cv01370
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv00933
Defendant:
James Johnson, CSP Prison and LT Mexican Lady
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Chaffee Court et al
as 1:2021cv00020
Defendant:
Patrick Murphy, Sam Weihman, Ramsey and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Weiser et al
as 1:2021cv00011
Defendant:
Jason R. Dunn, Sam Weihman and Philip Weiser
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Dunn et al
as 1:2020cv03811
Defendant:
Jason R. Dunn, Lewis T. Babcock, Denvers Federal Prosecutors and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2020cv00587
Plaintiff:
Tavores Kasel Montgomery, Quincey Sanders, Paul Alvin Womack, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Liston Maron Richardson, George Lee Thompson, III, Gregory L. Reaser and others
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Steven T. Marshall, Louis V. Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Warden, FCI Beaumont
as 1:2020cv00492
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont
Petitioner:
Christopher Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00929
Plaintiff:
Tavores Kasel Montgomery, Treundous Qwavon Davis, Dameon Tunnell Stewart and others
Defendant:
Jennifer Anderson King, Sharon Folks, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Petitioner:
Liston Maron Richardson, George Lee Thompson, III, Steven Christopher Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Colorado Justice Department et al
as 1:2020cv02472
Defendant:
Zeyen Wu, Colorado Justice Department and Jason Dunn
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Weiser
as 1:2020cv02470
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Defendant:
Philip Weiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
