Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Fludd v. City of Florence et al
as 4:2020cv01686
Plaintiff:
Brandon Fludd
Defendant:
City of Florence and Christopher Bachochin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00302
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00239
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad
Brickey v. City of Florence et al
as 6:2019cv00522
Defendant:
James MacFarlane, Thomas Turner, John Does, 1-9 and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Brickey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Florence v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45084
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Florence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Florence Alabama v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45073
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Florence Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yoakum v. City of Florence, Mississippi et al
as 3:2019cv00103
Defendant:
Alex Ward and City of Florence, Mississippi
Plaintiff:
Robert Yoakum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Florence v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv00007
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Florence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The City of Florence Alabama v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 5:2019cv00191
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Florence Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
