Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Davis v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2025cv00630
Plaintiff:
Clarence Davis
Defendant:
Snohomish County and Snohomish County Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Davis v. Pepper et al
as 3:2024cv00808
Defendant:
Pepper, Lindsey Kowalski, Peppers and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence T Davis and Clarence Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv04242
Plaintiff:
Larry Bieling, Opal Darlane Blackmon, Jimmie Bartee and others
Defendant:
UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Davis, III et al v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv06527
Defendant:
Strength of Nature, LLC, Namaste Laboratories, Avlon Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Davis, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dixon et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00869
Plaintiff:
Dennis Barnes, Larry Bieling, Robert Alexander and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Dixon et al v. 3M Company et al
as ALN/2:24-cv-00869
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome Dixon, Robert Alexander, Kevin Alexander and others
Clarence Davis v. Capital One N.A.
as 23-281
Petitioner:
CLARENCE DAVIS
Respondent:
CAPITAL ONE N.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
