Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Bank of America, N.A. v. Jericho Baptist Church
as 20-1725
Defendant:
CLIFFORD BOSWELL, JERICHO BAPTIST CHURCH MINISTRIES, INC., Jericho MD, GLORIA MCCLAM-MAGRUDER and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Defendant / Appellant:
JERICHO BAPTIST CHURCH MINISTRIES, INC., Jericho DC
Bank of America, N.A. v. Jericho Baptist Church Ministries, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv02953
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:
Jericho Baptist Church Ministries, Inc., Denise Killen, Clifford Boswell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Franklin v. Jackson et al
as 8:2014cv00497
Plaintiff:
Renee Franklin
Defendant:
Clarence Jackson , Gloria McClam-Magruder , Denise Killen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jericho Baptist Church Ministries, Inc. v. Peebles et al
as 8:2013cv02586
Plaintiff:
Jericho Baptist Church Ministries, Inc.
Defendant:
Joel R. Peebles, Sr. , William A. Meadows , Keith Moore and others
Counter_claimant:
Joel R. Peebles, Sr. , William A. Meadows , Keith Moore and others
Counter_defendant:
Jericho Baptist Church Ministries, Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Joel R. Peebles, Sr. , William A. Meadows , Keith Moore and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Gloria McClam-Magruder , Denise Killen , Clarence Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 7:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
James Clarence Jackson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hamlette v. Murray et al
as 2:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
Tyrone D. Hamlette
Defendant:
Eward W. Murray, Gene Johnson, Ron Angelone and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Emch, et al v. Owens-Corning, et al
as 2:2001cv01069
Defendant:
3M Company
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Emch, Anna Lee Emch, Thomas W. Berisford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to Bankruptcy Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
