Cases 41 - 50 of 121
COMMON CAUSE et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv02023
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, WILBUR L. ROSS, JR., CHERYL L. JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREA M. ALEXANDER, ROBERTO AGUIRRE, SHEILA AGUIRRE and others
Amicus Curiae:
LIBBY GARLAND, LUSH COSMETICS LLC, STEVEN RUGGLES and others
Petitioner:
ELIZABETH WARREN, IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE and RON WYDEN
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce C
Common Cause Rhode Island et al v. Gorbea et al
as 1:2020cv00318
Plaintiff:
Barbara Monahan, League of Women Voters of Rhode Island, Miranda Oakley and others
Defendant:
Rhode Island Republican Party, Nellie M. Gorbea, Diane C. Mederos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
People Not Politicians Oregon, et al v. Beverly Clarno
as 20-35630
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDEPENDENT PARTY OF OREGON, NAACP OF EUGENE/SPRINGFIELD, C. NORMAN TURRILL and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BEVERLY CLARNO, Oregon Secretary of State
Amicus Curiae:
OUR OREGON, ACCION POLITICA PCUNISTA, THE ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN NETWORK OF OREGON, BASIC RIGHTS OREGON, FAMILY FORWARD OREGON, NEXT UP ACTION FUND, PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCATES OF OREGON, AND UNITE OREGON and KATE BROWN, Oregon Governor
COMMON CAUSE INDIANA v. LAWSON et al
as 1:2020cv01825
Defendant:
KEVIN C. SMITH, SUZANNAH WILSON OVERHOLT, PAUL RAUSCH and others
Plaintiff:
COMMON CAUSE INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
People Not Politicians Oregon et al v. Clarno
as 6:2020cv01053
Defendant:
Bev Clarno
Plaintiff:
Independent Party of Oregon, NAACP of Eugene/Springfield, C. Norman Turrill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelvin Jones, et al v. Governor of Florida, et al
as 20-12003
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE, STATE OF NEBRASKA, THE STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA SECRETARY OF STATE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LUIS A MENDEZ, CURTIS BRYANT, LEE HOFFMAN and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ALABAMA
Republican National Committee et al v. Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv01055
Plaintiff:
Republican National Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee and California Republican Party
Defendant:
Alex Padilla and Gavin Newsom
Intervenor Defendant:
Democratic Party of California, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Community Coalition and others
Amicus Curiae:
Public Interest Legal Foundation, American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Issa et al v. Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv01044
Plaintiff:
Darrell Issa, Jerry Griffin, Michael Sienkiewicz and others
Defendant:
Alex Padilla and Gavin Newsom
Amicus Curiae:
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, Public Interest Legal Foundation and others
Intervenor:
California LULAC
Intervenor Defendant:
Democratic Party of California, Community Coalition, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swenson, Jill et al v. Bostelmann, Marge et al
as 3:2020cv00459
Defendant:
Mark L. Thomsen, Dean Knudson, Meagan Wolfe and others
Plaintiff:
Melody McCurtis, Black Leaders Organizing for Communities, Jill Swenson and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Republican Party Of Wisconsin, The Wisconsin Legislature and Republican National Committee
Amicus Curiae:
Common Cause Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Georgia Association of Latino Elected Officials, Inc. et al v. Gwinnett County Board of Registration and Elections et al
as 1:2020cv01587
Plaintiff:
Georgia Association of Latino Elected Officials, Inc., Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Atlanta, Inc., Common Cause and others
Defendant:
Ben Satterfield, John Mangano, Brad Raffensperger and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10503
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
