Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greenwood v. Arthrex, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01101
Plaintiff:
Leslie M. Greenwood
Defendant:
Arthrex, Inc., TE Connectivity Corporation f/k/a Heat Shrink Innovations, LLC, Precision Edge Surgical Products Company LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EMT Engineering Sales, Inc. v. Te Connectivity Corporation
as 1:2021cv00967
Defendant:
Te Connectivity Corporation and Tyco Electronics Corporation
Plaintiff:
EMT Engineering Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trelleborg Sealing Solutions US, Inc. v. TE Connectivity Corporation et al
as 8:2020cv01966
Plaintiff:
Trelleborg Sealing Solutions US, Inc.
Defendant:
TE Connectivity Corporation and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huang v. Computer Connection Corporation
as 0:2020cv01988
Plaintiff:
Xiaohua Huang
Defendant:
Computer Connection Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Webb v. May
as 1:2020cv00938
Plaintiff:
William J. Webb, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Robert May, James T. Vaughn Correctional Institute, Amos Calloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00006
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Charles Holcomb, II v. TE Connectivity Corporation
as 19-6245
Defendant / Appellee:
TE CONNECTIVITY LTD. and TE CONNECTIVITY CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES NATHAN HOLCOMB, II
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
