Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Robert Sarvis v. Charles Judd
as 15-1162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT C. SARVIS
Plaintiff:
LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA, WILLIAM HAMMER, JEFFREY CARSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. JUDD, in his individual and official capacities as member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, DONALD PALMER, in his individual and official capacities as member of the Virginia State Board of Elections and KIMBERLY T. BOWERS, in her individual and official capacities as member of the Virginia State Board of Elections
Brown et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv28774
Plaintiff:
Patricia Piehl Brown and Conrad Brown
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sarvis et al v. Judd et al
as 3:2014cv00479
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Sarvis , Libertarian Party of Virginia , William Hammer and others
Defendant:
Charles E. Judd , Donald Palmer and Kimberly T. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Heritage Pacific Financial
as 1:2011cv05311
Plaintiff:
Conrad Brown
Defendant:
Heritage Pacific Financial
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Brown v. Davis et al
as 1:2011cv00003
Plaintiff:
James Conrad Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
Kathy Davis, Scott L Downing, Richard N Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Jayco Enterprises Inc et al
as 2:2009cv04818
Plaintiff:
Tammy Conrad Brown, Tammy Conrad Brown, Felix Bodden and others
Defendant:
Jayco Enterprises Inc and Fluor Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. Bennett
as 1:2008cv00062
Plaintiff:
James Conrad Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
Donald Bennett
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. McLemore
as 1:2007cv00188
Plaintiff:
James Conrad Brown
Defendant:
Bobby McLemore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
