Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Scotto v. New York University Hospital of Brooklyn New York et al et al
as 1:2019cv00701
Defendant:
Mellon Trust et al, M. Dyer and Sons Inc. and Affilates et al, U.S. F.D.A. et al and others
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Deborah Cooney v. City of San Diego, et al
as 19-16180
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS, CHRISTOPHER JACOBS, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE TROOPERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBORAH COONEY
ESTES v. CONSULATE HEALTH CARE et al
as 1:2019cv00975
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and CONSULATE HEALTH CARE dba CONSULATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
Plaintiff:
JENNELL ESTES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Knapp v. Consulate Health Care
as 3:2018cv01941
Defendant:
Consulate Health Care
Plaintiff:
Wilma Knapp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Sewell v. Consulate Health Care
as 3:2017cv00499
Defendant:
Consulate Health Care
Plaintiff:
Sharon Sewell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHETSEL v. CONSULATE HEALTH CARE LLC
as 4:2017cv00332
Defendant:
CONSULATE HEALTH CARE, LLC and 207 MARSHALL DRIVE OPERATIONS LLC
Plaintiff:
TANYA M WHETSEL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
McCarthy v. 207 Marshall Drive Operations, LLC et al
as 6:2015cv02121
Plaintiff:
Joyce McCarthy
Defendant:
207 Marshall Drive Operations, LLC, Consulate Health Care LLC, Colonial Lakes Health Care, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv01860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
