Cases 11 - 20 of 5,528
Gillis, et al. v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al.
as 1:2022cv11733
Plaintiff:
Robert J Gillis
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alfa Laval Inc., Ametek, Inc., individually and as successor to Schutte & Koerting and others
Cross Defendant:
Blackmer, BNS Co., Carrier Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
Crosby Valve, LLC, General Electric Company, Harvard University and others
Interested Party:
Industry Products Company
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
BAGLEY et al v. ABB, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv03531
Cross Defendant:
THOMAS BAGLEY, ELIZABETH BAGLEY, BEAZER EAST, INC. and others
Defendant:
ABB, INC., BIRD CORPORATION, BRAND INSULATIONS, INC. and others
Cross Claimant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP., COPES VULCAN, FLOWSERVE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Susan Rogers v. AO Smith Corp, et al
as 22-2592
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN M. ROGERS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM R. ROGERS, III, DECEASED, AND WIDOW IN HER OWN RIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
AO SMITH CORP, A W CHESTERTON INC, ALLEN BRADLEY CO and others
Defendant:
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO, BEAZER EAST INC, formerly known as KOPPERS, BROUDY SUPPLY and others
Talarczyk et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 8:2022cv00836
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS TALARCZYK and WANDA ALGARIN TALARCZYK
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, ALFA LAVAL INC., THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jonathan C. Hollinshead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Scott v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 3:2022cv00613
Defendant:
Cameron International Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corporation, Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Horton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al.
as 3:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
JULIA, Individually and as Special Administrator o HORTON and Julia Horton
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Successor-by-Merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., ALFA LAVAL INC., as Successor-in-Interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY, AR WILFLEY AND SONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Marcia Vanover v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation
as 3:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
MARCIA VANOVER, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of DAVID VANOVER, Deceased and Marica Vanover
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Successor-by-Merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., A.O. Smith Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. and Pneumo Abex LLC
Cross Defendant:
Kohler, Co., Sid Harvey Industries Inc. and York International Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Wrongful Death
Callahan et al v. New England Insulation Company et al
as 1:2022cv10243
Cross Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Fort Kent Holdings, Inc., Aurora Pump Co. and others
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc., IMO Industries, Inc., CBS Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Callahan and Mary Callahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Nikolaus J. Marcher et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Nikolaus J. Marcher and Lynne Marcher
Petitioner:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., 3M Company aka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AES Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mendoza et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2021cv01911
Defendant:
3M Company, ABB Incorporated, Crown Holdings and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Mendoza, Rick Mendoza and Angelo Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
