Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Kirk Cottom v. United States
as 26-1808
Petitioner: Kirk Cottom
Appellee: United States of America
Kirk Cottom v. United States
as 26-1809
Petitioner: Kirk Cottom
Respondent: United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2025cv06696
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bogle v. City of Palmetto, Florida et al
as 8:2025cv02957
Plaintiff: Sean F. Bogle, Esq.
Defendant: City of Palmetto, Florida, Caleb Cottom, Martin Illames and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Bogle et al
as 8:2025cv02956
Defendant: Sean F. Bogle, Esq., City of Palmetto, Florida, Caleb Cottom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dyer et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv06203
Defendant: 3M Company, Dupont De Nemours Inc, EIDP Inc and others
Plaintiff: Dustin Dyer, Richard Altamirano, Russell J. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 a1 Federal Officer Removal
Dyer et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2025cv04186
Defendant: 3M Company, DuPont De Nemours Inc., EIDP, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Dustin Dyer, Richard Altamirano, Russell J. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
COTTOM et al v. SELENE FINANCE LP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2025cv01903
Plaintiff: DAVID E COTTOM, JR and KELLI E COTTOM
Defendant: SELENE FINANCE LP and U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR RCF2 ACQUISITION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00163
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Cottom
as 25-476
: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: KIRK COTTOM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?