Cases
Namati v. Cotton States Insurance Company
as 4:2009cv02526
Plaintiff: Mohamad Namati
Defendant: Cotton States Insurance Company and Cotton States Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract None
Ledet et al v. Camp et al
as 2:2009cv07053
Plaintiff: Sullivan C. Ledet, Jr., Sullivan C. Ledet, Jr., Sullivan C. Ledet, Jr. and others
Defendant: Lawrence Shane Camp, Wackenhut Corporation, Wackenhut Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Dean v. Hatten et al
as 1:2008cv02153
Plaintiff: G. Thomas Dean
Defendant: James N. Hatten, Julie E. Carnes, Sharon Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Dean v. Handel et al
as 1:2008cv02129
Plaintiff: Thomas G. Dean
Defendant: Karen Handel, The Supreme Court of State of Georgia, The Georgia Bar Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Thomas v. Gasaya et al
as 4:2008cv00862
Plaintiff: Shanna G Johnson Thomas and Shanna G Johnson Thomas
Defendant: Peter M Gasaya, Gasaya Transportation and Cotton States Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
Flowers v. Cotton States Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00345
Plaintiff: Lynda Flowers
Defendant: Cotton States Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Borgman v. Farm Bureau Incurance of NC, Inc et al
as 6:2008cv00653
Plaintiff: Phyllis J Borgman
Defendant: Farm Bureau Incurance of NC, Inc, Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company and Cotton States Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Both
Upchurch et al v. Cotton States Insurance Company
as 4:2007cv00040
Plaintiff: Alfred Upchurch and Zita Upchurch
Defendant: Cotton States Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?