Cases 1 - 10 of 784
Cruz v. Board of Elections in the City of New Yok et al
as 1:2024cv03153
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Cruz
Defendant:
Board of Elections in the City of New Yok, The City of New York, Karen Koslowithzz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Camus, et al. v. Sharp Healthcare
as 24-2520
Plaintiff:
HANNAH COUSIN, DEANNA FRANKLIN-PITTMAN, LINDA CAMUS and others
Defendant:
SHARP HEALTHCARE
Cousin, et al. v. Sharp Healthcare
as 24-2511
Plaintiff:
HANNAH COUSIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LINDA CAMUS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, DEANNA FRANKLIN-PITTMAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
SHARP HEALTHCARE
Cousin v. FCA US LLC
as 2:2024cv00972
Plaintiff:
Curtis Cousin
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cousin v. Madison Heights Police Department
as 2:2024cv10582
Plaintiff:
Charles Cousin
Defendant:
Madison Heights Police Department
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Scott, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Earnest Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Laurel R. Harry, John Rivello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
