Cases 1 - 10 of 24,023
Isham v. Richardson et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ralph E. Isham
Defendant:
Chief Craig Richardson, Sergeant Kenneth Lloyd, Scott Kinderdine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patton v. Frank et al
as 1:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Craig Andrew Patton #356869, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Frank, Unknown Shae, Unknown Vanwormer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Alizon Lopez et al v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONES OF COUNTY OF MESA, COLORADO et al
as 1:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
Estate of Alizon Lopez and SHAWN LUCIUS
Defendant:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONES OF COUNTY OF MESA, COLORADO, Todd Rowell, Craig Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 198
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00745
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Craig Dobbs, et al v. United States
as 24-1942
Plaintiff:
Craig Dobbs and Eileen Dobbs
Defendant:
United States of America
Thomas v. County of Riverside, et al.
as 24-2810
Plaintiff:
CRAIG A. THOMAS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Craig v. The City of New York
as 24-1180
Plaintiff:
ALBERT CRAIG
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Correction Officer ELIAS HUSAMUDEEN, DOC Correction Officer, Former Commissioner CYNTHIA BRANN, Former DOC Commissioner and others
Braden Shafer v. United States
as 24-1450
Petitioner:
Braden Craig Shafer
Respondent:
United States of America
SHENK v. AMY L. GRIFFITHS
as 2:2024cv00957
Defendant:
AMY L. GRIFFITHS and AMY L. SHENK
Plaintiff:
CRAIG A. SHENK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
