Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Marshall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00458
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles C Marshall, George P Keary, Mark Kellianen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Craig Leonard v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv02575
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Leonard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BOUCK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11736
Plaintiff:
CRAIG LEONARD BOUCK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Authement v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv13795
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Craig Leonard Authement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Jones v. MCLAUGHLIN
as 7:2017cv00149
Petitioner:
CRAIG LEONARD JONES
Respondent:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams et al v. U.S. XPRESS, INC. et al
as 2:2015at01158
Plaintiff:
Deborah Williams and James Williams
Defendant:
U.S. XPRESS, INC. , U.S. XPRESS TRUCKING, U.S. XPRESS LEASING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. U.S. Xpress Inc., et al
as 2:2015cv02327
Plaintiff:
Deborah Williams and James Williams
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc. , U.S. Xpress Trucking, U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crayton v. Leonard et al
as 2:2014cv00909
Plaintiff:
Marsha Crayton
Defendant:
Craig Leonard, Auto Holdingcorp, LLC and Lade Ford, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Craig Junious v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-20469
Petitioner - Appellant:
CRAIG LEONARD JUNIOUS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
