Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Crapo v. City of Brownsville et al
as 1:2023cv00119
Petitioner:
Adam Scott Crapo
Respondent:
City of Brownsville and Cameron County, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austin Lightfeather v. Ken Prey, et al
as 22-2531
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant / Appellee:
Ken Prey, Administrator, in their individual capacity, Brad Johnson, Director of Administrations, in their individual capacity, Mr. Crapo, Religious Coordinator, in their individual capacity and others
Defendant:
Wilson, Officer and Four Unknown Inmates
Lightfeather v. Prey et al
as 8:2021cv00211
Defendant:
Dawning, Ken Prey, Four Unknown Inmates and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lightfeather v. McDonald et al
as 8:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Officer McDonald, One Unknown Corrections Officer, Crapo and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crapo v. Davie Police Department et al
as 0:2019cv63175
Defendant:
Davie Police Department, Kenny Fernandez and Dennis Murray
Plaintiff:
Adam Scott Crapo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Wendling et al
as 4:2017cv10416
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Robinson
Defendant:
Michael D. Wendling, Elwood L. Brown, Peter S. Burleigh and others
Crapo v. Broward County Jail
as 0:2015cv60179
Plaintiff:
Adam S. Crapo
Defendant:
Broward County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crapo v. Davis
as 1:2013at00524
Respondent:
Ron Davis
Petitioner:
Dale Crapo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crapo v. Davis
as 1:2013cv01190
Respondent:
Ron Davis
Petitioner:
Dale Crapo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Banks v. Does, et al
as 2:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels, Mike Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
