Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Reganos v. Watson et al
as 1:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
Ryan Reganos
Defendant:
Frances Watson, Robert Worle and Matthew Cristy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-20046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Dr. Dre et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Defendant:
Neverland Rach, Wang Film Productions, Dr. Dre and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzales v. Villanueva et al
as 1:2023cv03125
Plaintiff:
Cristy Gonzales
Defendant:
Bennie Villanueva and Chris Noeller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Rowe v. Judge Cristy Criag et al
as 2:2023cv01679
Plaintiff:
Michael Rowe
Defendant:
Judge Cristy Criag, Judge Natali Woods, Judge Jeannie Hua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cristi Campbell v. April Riahi, et al
as 23-3793
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRISTI CAMPBELL, Administratrix of the Estate on behalf of Bryana Baker
Defendant / Appellee:
APRIL RIAHI, Individually and in her official capacities as an employee of Butler County, Ohio, SHERIFF RICHARD K. JONES, Individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Butler County, Ohio, BUTLER COUNTY, OH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
v. Kamara et al
as 2:2023cv02335
Plaintiff:
Rosamond Kamara
Defendant:
Charleston School of Law, Ed Bell, Nicholas Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bright v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Cristy Bright
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
