Cases 1 - 10 of 3,024
Saldivar et al v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Daniel Saldivar, Michael Wolfe, Zurrell Hernandez and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Scott Crow, John or Jane Doe 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Donald v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Angela Donald
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, John Crow and Gwendolyn Babers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Hallahan v. Rayl et al
as 3:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joesph Hallahan
Defendant:
Kevin Rayl, Justin Bertrand, Johnathan Crow-Eby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00488
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Byrd, Derek Junior Adams, Jeffrey O'Brien Anglim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Crowe v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01380
Plaintiff:
Timothy Crowe
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Crow v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65200
Plaintiff:
David F. Crow
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hilbert v. Belfast Gastro Pub Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02515
Plaintiff:
Jacki Hilbert
Defendant:
Belfast Gastro Pub Inc., David Crowe and Robert Fortier
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Crow LLC v. Bayeh et al
as 2:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Crow LLC
Defendant:
Edgar Bayeh, Zilla Management LLC and Thomas Bayeh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Bayeh v. Crow
as 2:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Edgar Bayeh
Defendant:
Stephen E. Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
