Cases 31 - 40 of 222
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
McClain v. County of Sebastian et al
as 2:2022cv02096
Plaintiff:
Tyler McClain
Defendant:
County of Sebastian, Hobe Runion, Nick Tuttle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Challender v. Parmenter et al
as 5:2022cv05040
Plaintiff:
John Daniel Challender
Defendant:
Jason Parmenter, Rachel Curry, Don Hedrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Currie v. City of Elk River et al
as 0:2022cv00839
Plaintiff:
Brandon Currie
Defendant:
City of Elk River, Clayton Aswegan, Brandon Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Currie v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Susan Currie
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Curry v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2021cv02208
Plaintiff:
Kiyomi Curry
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Emcasco Insurance Company v. Bright et al
as 4:2021cv01150
Plaintiff:
Emcasco Insurance Company
Defendant:
Susie Bright Individually doing business as Bright Heating & Air, Alfred Frederick Currie, III and Stephanie Currie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Dunahue v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00959
Plaintiff:
Reginald L Dunahue
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall D Reed, Aundrea Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Currie v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv00284
Petitioner:
Solomon Seth Currie
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bottorff v. Dominicis et al
as 4:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones, Wellpath LLC and Victor Sean Bottorff
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
