Cases 11 - 20 of 462
Hawkins v. Carpenter, Jr et al
as 1:2023cv01269
Plaintiff:
Leon Hawkins
Defendant:
Ron Carpenter, Jr, Lylod Curry Brasfield and Cornelius Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv01305
Petitioner:
Ronald Curry
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGill et al v. Xponential Fitness LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03909
Plaintiff:
Shannon McGill, Gina Oliveira, Justin Curry and others
Defendant:
Xponential Fitness LLC, XPOF Assetco, LLC, AKT Franchise, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv12930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Odessey Curry
as 23-3839
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ODESSEY CHERRELL CURRY
Curry v. Trinity Health-Michigan
as 1:2023cv00979
Plaintiff:
Sonae Curry
Defendant:
Trinity Health-Michigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights-Jobs
Latausha Simmons v. City of Southfield, MI, et al
as 23-1724
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATAUSHA SIMMONS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, MI, SOUTHFIELD, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE CHIEF JOSEPH E. THOMAS, JR. and others
Wiley v. Green, et al
as 0:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Allen Wiley II and Allen Wiley, III
Defendant:
David Green, Nicholas Cleverger, Tyler Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry v. Wardlow
as 1:2023cv01122
Petitioner:
Stacy Curry
Respondent:
Jerry Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rucker et al v. Shelby County Board of Education et al
as 2:2023cv02358
Plaintiff:
Tikeila Rucker, Rachael Spriggs, Damon Curry-Morris and others
Defendant:
Shelby County Board of Education and Carolyn Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
