Cases 1 - 10 of 22
GAMBLE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv06862
Plaintiff:
JAKOB D. GAMBLE
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gamble v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv01803
Plaintiff:
Jakob D. Gamble
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Product Liability
Gamble v. Lider Transport LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03892
Plaintiff:
Shondale Gamble
Defendant:
Lider Transport LLC and Victor Martinez-Proano
3Rd Party Defendant:
Sadeek D. Gamble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Lawson v. Fisher, Jr. et al
as 1:2017cv01088
Plaintiff:
John L. Lawson
Defendant:
R. Fisher, Jr., D. Gamble, M. Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton Gamble v. Warden, London Corr
as 16-3109
Petitioner - Appellant:
BARTON D. GAMBLE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Gamble v. London Correctional Institution, Warden
as 3:2015cv00233
Petitioner:
Barton D Gamble
Respondent:
London Correctional Institution, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. James Gamble
as 13-5874
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES D. GAMBLE
Wetzel v. Gamble et al
as 2:2013cv02485
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Defendant:
Matthew D. Gamble, Robert C Tanner, Michael Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Gamble et al
as 5:2013cv00698
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, Michael Harrell, Darryl Mizell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
