Cases 21 - 30 of 82
Garrett v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2018cv02627
Plaintiff:
Ronald D Garrett
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, Johnson & Johnson and DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
Special Master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARRETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv14515
Plaintiff:
ALAN D. GARRETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett et al v. Lowe et al
as 5:2018cv05186
Defendant:
Mike Dunlap, Rick Esser, Johnny Akers and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Garrett and Shirley D. Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Alan Garrett
as 17-3834
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALAN D. GARRETT, aka Allen Garrett, aka Allan Garrett, aka Tyrone Garrett, aka Tyree Garrett, aka Tyrell Garrett
Mitchell v. Garrett et al
as 2:2017cv02653
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mitchell
Defendant:
D. Garrett and J.C. Real
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Alan Garrett
as 17-3713
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: ALAN D. GARRETT
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
Rankins v. Garrett et al
as 2:2017cv02235
Plaintiff:
Norman Rankins
Defendant:
D. Garrett and P. Lelis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdul-Ghafoor, et al v. Professional Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01105
Plaintiff:
Yuwsuf Abdul-Ghafoor, Rhoda Kathleen Blair, Linda Cohill and others
Defendant:
Professional Transportation, Inc. and Ronald D. Romain
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Muldrow v. Sessions, et al
as 1:2017cv00127
Plaintiff:
Lealon (Amir Musa) Muldrow
Defendant:
Jefferson B Sessions, III, Thomas Kane, Ian Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J & J Sports Productions, Incorporated v. Pam and Hazel's Place, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv12774
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Incorporated
Defendant:
Pam and Hazel's Place, LLC, First Class Consulting, LLC and Pamela D. Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
