Cases 1 - 10 of 100
HAYNES v TRENTON PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL et al.
as 1:2026cv11558
Plaintiff:
TYRIK HAYNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv09786
Plaintiff:
Leticia Haynes
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Elias v. Fondungalla et al
as 1:2026cv03549
Plaintiff:
Adam Elias
Defendant:
Fondungalla, Sandel, Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Bass et al
as 6:2026cv06111
Plaintiff:
Victoria L. Haynes
Defendant:
Benton Ned Bass, Brian J. Reis and Michelle Strauss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lamons v. Thompson et al
as 3:2026cv00921
Plaintiff:
Tristen Lamons
Defendant:
Master Sgt. Octavia Thompson, Lt. Malik Haynes, Captain Travis Batiste and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rueben v. Haynes et al
as 1:2026cv03904
Plaintiff:
Katrina Rueben
Defendant:
Rhonda Haynes, Sean Vogel and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Munoz Rodriguez v. Haynes et al
as 1:2026cv07230
Plaintiff:
Angel Munoz Rodriguez
Defendant:
Elijah Haynes and Dairy Farmers of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tm Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Haynes et al v. Menghani
as 2:2026cv02771
Plaintiff:
Tamara Haynes
Defendant:
Vikas Menghani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
McElroy et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2026cv10135
Plaintiff:
Daphne McElroy, Brayone Murff and Jason Haynes
Defendant:
City of Chicago and City of Chicago Comptroller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07115
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
