Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Haynes v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65154
Plaintiff:
Ms. Cheryl D. Haynes
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Zoerner et al
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
ArQuincy Lee Carr
Defendant:
Sheriff David Zoerner, Lt Kurt McKutis, J Sgt Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes et al v. Airport Technical Support LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01703
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Haynes and Haynes and Haynes PC
Defendant:
Airport Technical Support LLC and Scott A Saltzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kevin Watson v. B. Kanode
as 23-7098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN A. WATSON
Defendant / Appellee:
B. L. KANODE, H. SHARPE, T. DOWELL and others
Askari Lumumba v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASKARI DANSO MS LUMUMBA
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, JOSEPH WALTERS, DAVID ANDERSON and others
Nelson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Curtis Edward Nelson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Adrienne Givens, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrone Shelton v. Tracy Mathena
as 23-6695
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE SHELTON
Defendant / Appellee:
TRACY MATHENA, TIM HAMM, SGT. J. COE and others
Tyrone Shelton v. David Anderson
as 23-6693
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE SHELTON
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID ANDERSON, TRACY MATHENA, SGT. J. COE and others
Haynes v. Vela
as 2:2023cv04019
Plaintiff:
James D. Haynes
Defendant:
Jason Vela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
