Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Wiggins v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv02956
Plaintiff:
Taurus Antonio Wiggins
Defendant:
United States of America, William D. Quarles, Jr, Christine Marie Celest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Quarles v. Reynolds et al
as 0:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Roshaun D. Quarles
Defendant:
J. Reynolds, Melissa Pelfrey, Jacqueline Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justice, II v. Trecora Resources et al
as 1:2022cv03339
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Justice, II
Defendant:
Trecora Resources, Karen A. Twitchell, Patrick D. Quarles and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Redfield v. Trecora Resources et al
as 1:2022cv03301
Plaintiff:
Denise Redfield
Defendant:
Trecora Resources, Karen A. Twitchell, Patrick D. Quarles and others
Johnson v. Trecora Resources et al
as 1:2022cv04585
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Trecora Resources, Karen A. Twitchell, Patrick D. Quarles and others
Stein v. Trecora Resources et al
as 1:2022cv04474
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Trecora Resources, Karen A. Twitchell, Patrick D. Quarles and others
ECBI WARNER LLC et al v. TOMS et al
as 5:2021cv00148
Defendant:
CLIFFORD HOLMES, KEVIN LASHLEY, THOMAS RANDALL TOMS and others
Plaintiff:
ANTWON ALSOBROOK, eCBI Warner, LLC, JERRALD RECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Quarles v. Quintana
as 5:2018cv00472
Petitioner:
Marlon D Quarles
Respondent:
Warden, Federal Medical Center Lexington and Francisco Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taylor v. Quarles et al
as 1:2017cv06094
Plaintiff:
John E. Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
D. Quarles, Officer Ross, C Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Cohen v. William Quarles, Jr.
as 16-7412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY BRIAN COHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., U.S. District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
