Cases 1 - 10 of 255
Smith v. Gonzalez
as 24-40242
Plaintiff:
Derek D. Smith
Defendant:
Javier Gonzalez, Officer, Joe Elrod and City of Corpus Christi
Smith v. ALDI Inc
as 3:2024cv00855
Plaintiff:
Iglesias D Smith
Defendant:
ALDI Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-30848
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Byrd v. Smith et al
as 9:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
David B Byrd
Respondent:
Adrian D. Smith, Korey A. Baugh, Olushola Akarble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv02129
Plaintiff:
David B Byrd
Defendant:
Adrian D. Smith, Korey A. Baugh, Olushola Akarble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battson et al v. Mays et al
as 5:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Brittany R. Battson, Eric D. Smith, Taurin D. Wallace and others
Defendant:
Symphany Mays, J. Johnson, H. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johansen et al v. Myers et al
as 1:2023cv00006
Counter Defendant:
Lance Johansen and Mississippi Orthopedic Institute, PLLC
Defendant:
Phillip Myers, Paula Smith, John D. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Smith v. City of Corpus Christi Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Derek D. Smith
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi Police Department and City of Corpus Christi Parks and Recreation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Green et al
as 1:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
Kendrick D. Smith
Defendant:
Kim Green and Unknown Henderson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Ukegbu
as 3:2022cv01982
Plaintiff:
Marilyn D Smith
Defendant:
Ibidunni Ukegbu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
